Private RPCs protect your tx. LIP protects the Pool State. We solve the $500M leakage problem by enforcing intent-based liquidity at the hook level.
When you add $1M liquidity, bots see the pool state update instantly. LIP "muffles" this signal by breaking your $1M intent into stochastic, non-deterministic chunks.
LPs deposit assets into a non-custodial vault. They define 'How' and 'When' through verifiable intents, not immediate swaps.
Liquidity enters the Uniswap pool in bounded, randomized chunks. This removes the block-level signaling that MEV bots thrive on.
A custom hook forces all liquidity through the Intent Protocol. Direct pool interactions are hard-reverted at the runtime level.
LIP vs Legacy LP Solutions
| Feature Set | LIP (Our Prot.) | TWAMM Hooks | Privacy RPCs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enforcement Level | Pool-Level (Hook) | Strategy-Level | RPC-Level |
| Bot Protection | Structural (Chunking) | Predictable Path | Metadata only |
| MEV Resistance | Target: 90%+ | Partial (JIT Risk) | Low (Post-trade leak) |
| Capital Efficiency | High (Dynamic Bounds) | Fixed Intervals | Standard |
TWAMMs have fixed intervals (e.g. every 10 mins). Bots anticipate these schedules and sandwich the liquidity move perfectly. Prediction = Exploitation.
LIP uses randomized, bounded intervals. Bots cannot predict when the next chunk will hit. Uncertainty = Security.
Featured coverage and press releases

Read the full article about LIP Protocol's innovative approach to MEV protection.

Learn more about our latest developments and milestones in DeFi security.
// REVERT ALL DIRECT ATTEMPTS
function beforeAddLiquidity(address sender, ...) external override {
if (!isAuthorizedLIPExecutor(sender)) {
revert UnauthorizedDirectLiquidityActivation();
}
// Logic proceeds only via LIP-controlled chunks
processIntentChunk(params);
}